Following our report on FOI and local government in England, we have had some interesting reflections on how FOI works elsewhere. One of the really interesting points concerns how users are often focused on ‘local’ access to issues that are of importance to them. High profile expenses stories aside, FOI is actually about making a difference at the level of your own street or ‘micro-politics’ as someone wiser than me called it. Could this also be the way for new Open Data innovations such as fix my street?
Here’s the FOI (or FOIL) view from New York state:
‘Our FOI law (known by many as “FOIL”) has been in effect since 1974, and this office was created as part of the law. There are approximately 100 state agencies, but more important to most residents are the thousands of local government agencies, i.e., counties, cities, towns, villages, school districts and the like. Most residents have little connection with federal agencies in their daily lives and rarely have occasion to seek records under the federal FOIA. A few have relationships with and a need to gain access to records of state agencies. But everyone has a need at some point to seek information from local government, perhaps in relation to an environmental issue, building code and land use issues, the assessment of homes and other real property, the means by which taxpayers’ dollars are used or allocated by school districts, the qualifications of teachers and other public employees, the effectiveness of law enforcement functions – – the possibilities are endless.
We have also found, in general, that the smaller the unit of government, the more likely it is to be open. In short, there is direct accountability. Most residents here, in the capital city of Albany, would recognize the Mayor walking down the street. Few would recognize their congressman.
In short, despite the focus on Washington and the federal FOI Act, I believe that a local access to information law, such as the 50 separate state FOI laws in the US, or a law of general application that includes local government within its coverage, is of primary significance and utility to the average person. Further, for reasons suggested earlier, local government officials are more likely to comply with law and to be accountable that those higher up in the governmental chain of command.’
See http://www.dos.ny.gov/coog/ for more information, reports and analysis